I wanted to discuss something that has been bothering me for a long time now. As time goes on, it bothers me more and more. This entire social networking phenomenon has really exploded and within a very short period of time; we are talking far less than a ten year time span. If some of us within Western civilization have learned anything over the past fifty years or so, it is that anytime you have any form of mass communication, any form of mass media, you can rest assured The Tribe is already dominating or figuring out how to quickly gain dominance. And Western civilization has failed miserably in any effort to control how these forms of mass media are owned and used within our society.
If you have not already accepted that reality, you are probably wasting your time on the Nationalist Coalition website and won’t agree with practically anything we have to say. At this point in American history, there is no point in spending our time trying to convince anyone about Who Rules America. There are plenty of resources to document this and only the mentally vulnerable, those that choose to remain ignorant and are easily misdirected and fooled, will challenge this reality. We must accept the fact that to a VERY large extent, the mass-media is controlled and owned by Jews. We must accept the reality of Who Rules America and attempt to understand and deal with the consequences.
"There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's mass news and entertainment media. Who Rules America, credited to Dr. William L. Pierce
Moving on from that fundamental premise, I find it very convenient, revealing, and yet not at all surprising when I see mainstream news media using so-called social networking websites to report the news these days. The first time I saw a big illustration of this was during last year’s Iranian election. If you research this subject beyond that level, you will also see that the same manipulators of public opinion, the same group that brings clarity and certainty to our understanding of Who Rules America, is also already firmly entrenched in this new media called social networking. Again, Western civilization has failed miserably in any effort to control how these forms of mass media are owned and in my opinion, we have failed again.
This phenomenon is not only attracting The Tribe within the existing controlled mass-media and advertising industry however. If you dig into the subject just a little bit you will learn that the influence of The Tribe goes much deeper than that. It is not only much deeper, but is much more intangible and in some cases, really hard to see and understand. Yet in other cases, it is very easy to see and understand just as it is with much of the traditional, existing controlled mass-media. Additionally, this new form of media, this social networking media, is by definition allowing for a much more efficient and global scope for the influence The Tribe has. This near universal reach adds to the urgency and diligence we must have towards understanding it.
We are already seeing what many are calling the “democratization of the internet” and social networks are the supposed catalyst for this revolutionary change. If you have ever given much serious thought at all to the concept of “democracy” or to its viability and consequences on the future of our people, you should shutter anytime anyone says “democratization of the internet”. This is very dangerous on several levels and we must understand how this can, will, and already has impacted our society.
As this social networking phenomenon continues to grow, we will be fooled into thinking there has been a real shift away from the importance and influence of traditional media. But ultimately this shift does not change the forces that control the media, Who Rules America, at all. The shift will provide an illusion of a more competitive, neutral world of news and information but the forces that have control over news and information today will still have it in the future.
And for the record, there are many voices out there already making excuses or denying the obvious Jewish influence within both the traditional media as well as this new media. They will dismiss any and all criticisms of Jewish media influence and ownership. They laugh it off as some sort of anti-Semitic, “neo-nazi” conspiracy or something. Those are the feckless buffoons that do not deserve anything but the proverbial boot-to-the-head. We should not care what they think.
Social Networking
First, let’s be clear on what I mean by “social networking” web sites. I am no expert on this and honestly do not spend any time exploring these websites but millions of people do. Essentially, at least ostensibly, these are online communities comprised of people who have some common interests that they want to share with others. And if everyone is not interested in actually sharing with their online community, they are at least interested in exploring what others share. Sure, it sounds innocent enough and taken out of context, at a theoretical level, it sounds like simply a societal evolutionary shift within the boundaries of modern technology.
According to a report from “The Nielsen Company”, the well-known media rating company and self-described “world’s leading marketing and media information company”, the shear magnitude and growth of “social networking” is shocking. This Nielsen report groups both social networks and blogs into a category it calls “Member Communities.” The growth and saturation of these “Member Communities” is staggering. In a report called “Global Faces and Networked Places”, Nielsen estimates that these social network communities account for “over two-thirds (67 percent) of the global online population”.
Think about that for a moment. Think about just the total number of the “online population” in the United States. Estimates put the total U.S. population in 2009 at about 308 million people. Nielson and other research companies estimate that roughly 74% of the U.S. population is online or considered internet users. So of that percentage of the U.S. population, the estimate is that roughly 153 million make up the “social networking” population in the United States (includes both social networks and blogs). I have seen estimates from the U.S. Census bureau that put the number of households with a television set at only roughly 110 million. But our online population is closer to 153 million! Now extrapolate that estimate of over two-thirds to the global population. This is completely unprecedented in the history of the world and the concept of mass communication.
Additional findings in the Nielsen report assert that these social networks are now the 4th most popular online activity, moving ahead of personal email in terms of how the global online population spends its time online. The report estimates that “one in every 11 minutes online globally is accounted for by social network and blogging sites”. It is easy to underestimate what we are saying here. It is really difficult to fully comprehend the magnitude of this phenomenon.
According to the CEO of Nielsen Online, John Burbank: “While two-thirds of the global online population already accesses member community sites, their vigorous adoption and the migration of time show no signs of slowing.”
Now think about that. After less than a decade, these social networking communities have grown to a size that is estimated to comprise almost 70% of the entire global online population. That is what I mean by staggering and it is absolutely why The Tribe has its fangs deeply embedded already. If you think for a moment about what the global online population is, we are talking tens of millions of people, millions and millions, and if almost 70% already frequent these social networks, that amounts to a new form of electronic media, a “new media” that has absolutely no historic parallels. Nothing even comes close.
Now maybe you can appreciate why the explosion of social networking has been bothering me. Given our track record thus far for managing the media our people are exposed to, or better stated, the complete lack of management, we should all be bothered by what we already know about social networking sites. We should all be alarmed by the size, growth, the global reach, and most of all the ownership of these social networking communities. Any time there is anything resembling any kind of “new media”, we better take notice.
The most prominent of these social networking sites are Facebook, MySpace, and more recently Twitter. Of these, Facebook is by far the largest and the most popular in the world. Though not really a social networking or blog site, the so-called “Free Encyclopedia”, Wikipedia, has the exact same conceptual framework within this “democratization of the internet” façade and has the exact same Tribal influence. There are many others like these but I want to focus on just these four for now. These sites can be grouped into a category of what is being called “new-media”, which is intended to represent the newly emerged technology of digital or computerized, networking form of information and communication that has emerged in the later part of the 20th century. So let’s take a look at these big four for now.
Facebook
Facebook is by far the largest and most powerful of the social networking sites. While demographic variables such as age and location can bounce that statistic around a little with MySpace, nobody disputes that Facebook is king. It is really the undisputed largest social networking site in the world, including members from every continent on the globe. The only reliable source for data suggests that there are 150 million members across the world using Facebook. New reports out just recently claim the current global member list is now closer to 350 million. And of these, it is said that half of those users are logged-in and using Facebook every day.
Facebook is a privately-owned company and is run by its Jewish CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, and its Jewess COO, Sheryl Sandberg. Interestingly enough, Sandberg is also on the board of directors at The Walt Disney Company, you know, the one chaired by the Jewish President and CEO Bob Iger (it truly is a small world after all), but we have moved past the premise of Who Rules America. According to the Nielsen report, “Facebook is now visited by three in every ten people online across the world”. That is what I call power and it is owned and operated largely by these two Jews.
From his Harvard dorm room in 2004, Zuckerberg co-founded Facebook and at one time was listed by Forbes as the “world's youngest billionaire”. He is currently listed at 158 on the latest “Forbes 400 Richest Americans 2009”. He is 25 years old. His fellow Harvard roommate and Facebook co-founder is Jewish Dustin Moskovitz. Another official co-founder is Eduardo Saverin and while I am not certain whether or not he spins the dradel, he is apparently one of Zuckerberg’s frat brothers at Alpha Epsilon Pi, a Jewish fraternity. Then there is the lowly goy, Chris Hughes, another Facebook official co-founder, who left Facebook several years ago to head up Barack Obama’s Web outreach campaign and developed My.BarackObama.com, I think we all know how well that went.
MySpace
Facebook was not always king and the largest social networking site in the world was once MySpace, which still holds a number two position behind Facebook. As the worlds second largest social networking site with roughly 125 million users, MySpace is squarely in the number two rank for total members. But MySpace is king when it comes to revenue from advertisers. In 2008 it was estimated that MySpace generated $1 billion in revenue, yes that is billion with a B. Facebook had estimated revenue from advertisers of only $300 million. Additionally, though smaller geographically than Facebook, MySpace tends to focus more on targeting teenagers and young adults by offering more entertainment and customization options to its users. So if you think about estimated ad revenue of $1 billion, a targeted demographic of teenagers and young adults, you can imagine how close The Tribe is to MySpace.
MySpace is a subsidiary of Fox Interactive Media, which is now called News Corporation Digital Media, which is headed by the Jewish President, Peter Levinsohn. News Corporation Digital Media is a subsidiary of the world's second largest media conglomerate, News Corporation, and of course that is under the Jewish Chairman and CEO, Rupert Murdoch. I put Murdoch in the same boat as Sumner Redstone and among the most powerful men in the country, which can also be said as amongst the most powerful Jews in the country.
For sure, Rupert Murdoch did not create MySpace he just saw the demographics, revenue potential, and a somewhat genetic proclivity towards media ownership which led him to purchase it. Aside from the allure that targeting teenagers and young adults has on Jews like Murdoch, MySpace was an extension of his already existing media empire. This empire has TV programming all over the world and publishes nearly 200 major newspapers like the New York Post and The Times of London. His empire includes Twentieth Century Fox, the Fox Network, and much more. An article in Businessweek reported that “as many as one in five American homes at any given time will be tuned into a show News Corporation either produced or delivered." You have to go back a little further in history to understand the genesis for MySpace but the conclusions are much the same.
MySpace evolved out of another social networking site in 2003 and was owned by the publicly held, Intermix Media, Inc. (previously known as eUniverse), which was headed by the Jewish CEO, Richard Rosenblatt, who was also the Chairman of MySpace at the time. Apparently MySpace was originally created in 2004 by Brad Greenspan, Chris DeWolfe, Josh Berman, and Tom Anderson. From what I have seen, Anderson, Greenspan and Berman are all Jews (apparently Tom Anderson is Jewish on his maternal side of the family and some reports assert he was raised in a messianic Jewish home). And that is only for starters. Add to the MySpace pioneers a former Chairman, the Jewish Richard Rosenblatt, a senior Vice President, the Jewish Travis Katz, a handful of other Jews like Josh Brooks, Jeff Berman, Chris DeWolfe, and surely many more, you get the picture. There may be some lowly goys in the MySpace woodpile but it is mostly a kosher-crew from creation to current ownership and leadership.
Twitter
Twitter is the newest entry onto the social networking stage and it is unlike Facebook and MySpace in several ways. It is yet another new form of electronic media, or “new media”, that they are calling “micro-blogging.” It is still a form of social networking but is used more for real-time communication or sending what they call tweets via the Twitter website, text messaging via mobile phones/PDAs (including a mobile site at m.twitter.com), or a variety of other applications. Twitter is much more conversational in format and already very well integrated in the blogosphere. But more importantly, it is changing the news industry and how people receive information about what is going on in the world.
Twitter was officially formed in 2006 and is already in the top 15 of the coveted Alexa’s “top 500 sites”. Twitter is currently ranked #12, already well ahead of #17 MySpace which has been around a few years longer (Facebook is currently #2!, just behind Google and ahead of YouTube and Yahoo). According to The Nielsen Company, in February of this year, Twitter was the “the fastest growing site in the Member Communities category.” From February 2008 to February 2009, unique visits to Twitter increased from 475,000 unique visitors to 7 million! A recent report from CNN/Time claims that there are roughly 18 million members registered to share their thoughts in tweets (a new word for the maximum 140-character text messages made famous by Twitter).
Twitter is a privately owned company based out of San Francisco. As with any privately owned company, it is not always clear how the ownership and control is divided up. Usually ownership of Twitter is attributed to just a few individuals; Jack Dorsey, current Chairman, Evan Williams, current CEO, and Biz Stone, current Creative Director. Prior to the formation of Twitter, Evan Williams and Biz Stone were with a company called Obvious Corp. which was a company formed when they bought Odeo, Inc. which had a side project called Twitter. Odeo was yet another privately held company cofounded by Evan Williams, current CEO, and Noah Glass. It is not uncommon to see Noah Glass listed as a one of the original co-founders of Twitter but given his more obvious Jewish background he usually falls off most of the official lists.
That is for sure the quickest, easiest, and official description of Twitter but it is not the full story. It is just a partial snapshot into the preferred explanation of who owns and operates Twitter. And as a private company, that may be all we have to work with at least until Murdoch, Redstone or one of the other media moguls gobbles it up. When you think about Twitter and its rapid rise to the top of the list of social media/blogosphere sites, it is more useful to understand the technology and software developments attributed to the original Twitter founders but even more important, the source of funding and seed money they attracted.
So a more accurate description of who owns and operates Twitter requires a bit more diligence and research. Below is what I was able to dig up to help answer the question, ‘who owns and operates Twitter’. It is not comprehensive and perhaps time will allow us to learn even more but the conclusions are the same as with all the other “new media” owners we have already discussed. I am going to spend a little more time discussing Twitter because the history is not as transparent as the other social networking sites. But again, the conclusions and Tribal influence are the same.
From Blogger to Google to Twitter, The Tribe Latches on
I will be honest; I am not 100% confident any or all of these Twitter guys are Jews. But I am 100% confident two-thirds of them act very Jewish. I suspect that Jack Dorsey is probably just a nerd-tech-geek from the Midwest, one getting the label "best and brightest" in technology by Business Week. On the other hand, Evan Williams and Biz Stone (pictured left with Williams) are probably both Jews and I base that assertion more on behavior than anything else. Biz Stone was born Christopher Isaac Stone and that certainly indicates a possible Jewish extraction. Evan Williams doesn’t carry a Tribal surname at all but his Sephardic looks alone could land him in the same extraction as his partner Isaac. Again, it is behavior that is most revealing with these two and as we will see, they have been very successful at attracting support and funding from The Tribe. So even without any obvious ancestral indication, Stone and Williams are an important part of the controlled “new media.”
The Jewish Tech Columnist at CNET, a Sumner Redstone owned media company, Rafe Needleman labeled Evan Williams the “Godfather of Twitter” and the label is certainly well suited. If you follow the career of Evan Williams back far enough, you will note he is the one usually attributed with coining the term “blogger” and was one of the original co-founders of Pyra Labs in 1999. Pyra Labs was the small company which originally created the “Blogger” software which is now a Google-owned entity. Other developers attributed to writing much of the “Blogger” code but it is Williams that usually gets the credit. It is really the advent of “Blogger” that has had one of the largest impacts on the growth of this “new media.” The growth of blogs and the blogosphere is one area that has had the most profound influence on how people get news and information today and it is what drives the notion of the democratization of news media.
At Pyra Labs, Evan William was the CEO (pictured right) but he relied heavily on outside investors to sustain and grow that company. After the dot-com bust bottomed out in 2001, Williams was supposedly the only employee left at Pyra and as his desperation grew so did his reliance on outside investors. That is where the Tribal influence becomes much more pronounced and clear with the Twitter crew.
As Williams struggled to maintain Pyra Labs he appealed to others that shared his ambition in this new media. That brought the Jewish founder of Trellix, Dan Bricklin, into the life of Evan Williams and in as an investor to save Pyra Labs. If you do not recognize Bricklin’s name you probably should. He and his fellow Jewish MIT graduate, Bob Frankston, are still recognized as developing the first PC based spreadsheet program. In 1979, the Jewish Bricklin and Frankston (pictured left) developed VisiCalc which is considered the first spreadsheet. These two have been called “the most influential players in the PC revolution” and well suited as investors for Williams. An investment from the Jewish owned and operated Trellix allowed Pyra Labs to not only rebound and expand; the surviving Pyra Labs would eventually rewrite the “Blogger” software, gaining notoriety and respect throughout the cyber world.
It was this new and improved “Blogger” software that caught the attention of the executives at Google, which at the time was still a privately held company by two Jewish software developers, Sergey Brin and Larry Page. In 2003, Google purchased Pyra Labs but at that time, both of these companies were privately held and the terms of the acquisition were never disclosed. The CEO of Pyra Labs, Evan Williams, and six other developers went to work at Google. The following year Google would go public and “the largest technology IPO in history” would make a lot of people very wealthy and really quickly. It was at Google that Evan met his future Twitter partner and co-founder, Biz Stone. This Google connection, not to mention the Jewish connections, is a common thread throughout the Twitter story.
Another thing worth noting are the other investors that helped to carry Pyra Labs, the predecessor of Twitter, into the Google family; that is to say the Jewish Sergey Brin and Larry Page family (pictured right) . As a private company, we will not know for sure but these investors are undoubtedly still involved with the Twitter crew today, some of them very vocal and proud about it. Needless to say, Evan Williams and Pyra Labs got start-up funding from some very interesting sources. The Jew Dan Bricklin at Trellix was just part of it. If I have learned anything about Evan Williams it is that he knows how to gain financial support and especially from Jewish investors. Williams co-founded Pyra Labs in January 1999. He did so with start-up funding from Advance Publications (parent to Condi Nast), Jerry Michalski, O'Reilly & Associates, and The Accelerator Group. Let’s take a quick look at these companies. (Sergey Brin pictured right)
Advance Publications
First, Williams was able to get seed-money from Advance Publications, Inc. If that does not ring a bell, it is part of the Jewish Newhouse family media conglomerate empire. The family-run business was originally started by Samuel Irving Newhouse Sr., born Solomon Neuhaus, who was the founder of Advance Publications which also controls Conde Nast Publications, a worldwide magazine publishing company. His son, Samuel Newhouse Jr. (pictured right) now controls it all and is on the Forbes list of world billionaires. Advance Publications is the largest privately owned media empire in the country, spanning newspapers, magazines (like Vogue, Vanity Fair, GQ), cable television, and the internet. Advance Publications is currently listed in the top fifty of the Forbes list of “America's Largest Private Companies”. It is estimated at having roughly $7.6 billion in annual revenue; yes that is billion with a B. Advance Publications, under the ownership and control of the Newhouse family, is a privately held company and can avoid publicly reporting much of anything. And that works out well for “new media” start-ups like Twitter.
Jerry Michalski
Williams was also able to get into the heart and wallet of Jerry Michalski. For those that don’t know, Michalski is a Jewish Polish surname common amongst Jews from Poland. Jerry Michalski is a member of the distinguished and highly revered Digerati, a list of the “elite of the computer industry and online communities”. This list of Digerati elite span a wide range of familiar sounding names like Stallman Lebkowsky, Rheingold, Brockman, Markoff, Myhrvold, Wurman, and on and on. These are the influential movers and shaker of the digital world.
And the connection between Williams and Michalski really goes beyond the obvious Jewish connection that permeates throughout the Twitter story. In many ways, Michalski really predicted the phenomenon we now refer to as instant messaging, text messaging, or Tweets. He was one of the industry gurus that applauded the loudest when an Israeli company named Mirabilis introduced the world’s first instant messaging program. Originally called ICQ (the shortened result of the phrase "I seek you"), was established by five Israelis: Yair Goldfinger, Sefi Vigiser, Amnon Amir, Arik Vardi, and Yossi Vardi). Eventually ICQ would be sold to AOL, then-owned by the Jew Gerald Levin and now run by the Jew Jeffrey Bewkes under Time Warner, is the world's largest entertainment conglomerate in terms of revenue (in front of News Corporation and Disney),
O'Reilly & Associates O'Reilly & Associates, which is also known as O'Reilly Media, is thought to be one of the largest investors in Pyra Labs and Evan Williams. It is another privately held company engaged in publishing books, magazines, and other online services. At one time Evan Williams was employed at O'Reilly Media as a Marketing Coordinator. While the owner of that company, Tim O'Reilly, sports an undisputedly Irish name, I would not call him Irish. He has this Spielberg Sephardic look going and is married to Christina Feldmann. But looks are only skin deep and we can learn more about Tim O'Reilly (pictured left) by his behavior.
First, Tim O'Reilly “Twitters” and currently has over 1.4 million followers on Twitter. Additionally, he helped write the popular “The Twitter Book” with his co-author, Sarah Milstein. I assume Sarah Milstein has as much Irish in her as Tim and his sweetie Feldmann. But that assumption could be seen as racist on the surface. We really should look beyond things like that to better understand Tim O'Reilly, O'Reilly Media, and that relationship with the Twitter boys.
You need only look at behavioral clues to come to essentially the same assumption, racist though they may seem. To see how this all adds up when you think about Tim O'Reilly, O'Reilly & Associates, and the subsequent influence on the world of Twitter, you just need to look. The most revealing thing to me about O'Reilly Media and its founder was Timmy’s introduction of the “Blogging Code of Conduct”. Jimmy Wales (pictured lower left) and Tim O'Reilly introduced that to the blogosphere a few years ago. For those of you that do not know, Jimmy Wales is the Jew who founded Wikipedia with his partner and fellow Jew, Larry Sanger. You do not have to know much about the laws of political correctness or how they are defined and enforced in our world today to imagine how the “Blogging Code of Conduct” will impact the virtual world and blogosphere as we know it. This is actually the main reason we researched the explosion of “new media” and how it was being controlled.
We really should put Wikipedia right up there with all of the other Jewish owned internet giants, like Google and the monopoly share of social networking. You do not have to look very hard to realize that Wikipedia is one of the most powerful sites on the web. It is ranked number 6 Alexa “The top 500 sites”. Using Google to look for virtually anything these days will prominently point you toward a Wikipedia site. You also do not have to look very hard to realize the obvious criticism that Wikipedia earns for having openly pro-Jewish and bias moderators. So Jimbo and Timmy are going to explain to all what the proper code of conduct should be.
The Accelerator Group
Yet another investor into Pyra Labs and the Evan Williams dream was the Accelerator Group. This is an investment company based out of the UK that was founded by venture capitalists, Robin and Saul Klein (a father and son team). These two Jews are well known in the business, investment, and digital-technology world but are also well-known within the Tribe. For example, Robin Klein is the current Chairman of The Jewish Chronicle. For those of you not savvy on your Jewish periodicals, the Jewish Chronicle is a UK-based newspaper and reportedly one of the “oldest continuously published Jewish newspaper in the world”. As you can imagine, being the Chairman of such a paper is a pretty big deal. Saul Klein, or junior to Jewish Chronicle Chairman, Robin Klein was once a Vice President at Skype, a Senior Vice President at Firefly Network, a co-founder and CEO at Video Island (now Lovefilm, a European competitor of NetFlix and Blockbuster), and much more. Robin and Saul Klein are what I would call Jew’s Jews and have a lot of influence.
I realize all this background on Twitter has resulted in a very dense and possibly boring read. But I think it is very important to understand how this company has emerged so quickly and how it was funded. To me, Twitter is the most dangerous of all these social networking sites. There seems to be a deliberate strategy to position Twitter, as well as the other social networking companies, as a news reporting and gathering resource. The appeal is the appearance of allowing for an almost instant, real-time information stream of what people around the world are saying or witnessing at any given moment. Twitter is already a tool being used by celebrities, but more alarming a broadcasting tool used by both politicians and journalists.
There is plenty of statistical information available regarding what is being reported and followed on Twitter. Once you get past all celebrity and professional sport stars spending time on Twitter, you can see what I mean.
For example, CNN Breaking News is in the top 10 Twitter accounts based on number of followers. But that is just the start of it. Twitter will bring you news from virtually every news agency in the world. You can get Tweets from the New York Times, Reuters, MSNBC, CBS, ABC News, Fox News, AP News, BBC News, The London Telegraph, and that is just to name a few. And as Biz Stone told NPR, Twitter is becoming its own AP news wire.
For politicians, Barack Obama has the 4th most followed Twitter account of the entire Twitter universe. Not surprising to most of us, the President of the United States of America follows people like Ashton Kutcher, Britney Spears, and Ellen DeGeneres. Much of the Obama campaign success during the 2009 Presidential election was attributed to how quickly his team embraced social networking for campaigning, especially Twitter. Biz Stone boasts that there are already “over 40 members of the U.S. Congress on Twitter”.
It is not just the controlled mass media and corrupt politicians jumping on the Twitter Kosher-wagon. Earlier this year Israel's New York Consulate held a “live citizen press conference” on Twitter. There is already a special Jewish Twitter group called Twoozer based out of Jerusalem. A report last year from the Israel News Agency reported that Israel, and the report was specifically calling out the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Israel Prime Minister's Office, and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), were aggressively employing social media including Twitter to offset international reaction to the UN sanctioned Goldstone Report, a report accusing Israel of war crimes during the Caste Lead offensive into Gaza.
Again, I realize this is a very long article and it may not be entertaining enough for some people. But we are not trying to entertain here. In a lot of ways, this was a research paper that came together after doing a lot searching and reading on this subject. We hope that it is at least educational, it certainly was for us. But this is also an embarrassing declaration of yet another failure for which I think we are all responsible. I honestly believe that Western civilization has failed AGAIN miserably to keep any control of how the mass media is owned and operated.
We knew better! We were warned! Those of us who have known full well the reality of Who Rules America also understood the consequences it had on our people. As the years ticked by and we watched the trends of digital media emerging stronger and stronger, we were too busy fighting amongst ourselves and preaching to the choir instead of trying to pioneer the technology which eventually led to the social media explosion. As we were busy trying to convince our very own people about the Sumner Redstones, Rupert Murdochs, and Michael Eisners of the world (to name only a few!), the Zuckerbergs, Moskovitzs, Rosenblatts, and Katzs of the world (to name only a few!) were busy figuring out an even more powerful, more expansive, efficient and concealed way to continue to control Who Rules America. We all know better.
I remember well over a decade ago Dr. Pierce (pictured right) really had an influence on my understanding of who was behind all of the racial problems we suffered from. He had a transcript called “Thoughts on Accepting Responsibility” that had a profound impact on many of us. I will quote briefly from here now and provide a link to read or listen to the full transcript.
"Then, after I'd looked into the ownership and management of the news and entertainment media which were pushing every destructive racial and social and political policy and I discovered that most of them were Jews, I figured I had the key to what was happening to America, and I tried to tell people about that. I'd say, "Listen, did you know that every major studio in Hollywood is run by Jews? Did you know that all three television networks are run by Jews?" In those days there were just three television networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC. And I'd start naming the Jews who were running the big film companies in Hollywood, the Jews who ran the networks, the Jews who owned the New York Times and the Washington Post and the three weekly news magazines. I'd say, "Hey, listen, the Jews make up less than three per cent of the population in the United States, and yet they control nearly every medium of mass communication. That's no coincidence." And people would tell me, "Well, so what? They're just good businessmen, that's all. They're clever at that sort of thing. That's how they got control. Don't worry about it."
And I'd say, "But don't you see, with their monopoly control of the media they're able to have an enormous influence on public opinion. Look at what they're doing with these television serials of theirs, All in the Family, and M*A*S*H, and the rest. They're all slanted the same way -- all of them. That's no coincidence. And by controlling the ideas and opinions of such a large segment of the public, they can control votes, they can control political candidates. That's why our government is pushing the same policies the media are pushing. It's no coincidence. Don't you understand?"
And people would say to me, "Don't talk like that. That sounds like anti-Semitism. You can't say anything that's anti-Semitic, because if you do the media will destroy you, they'll smear you, they'll cause you to lose your job. Go away; don't talk to me."
And I'd reply to them, "Look, I don't care what you call it -- anti-Semitism or patriotism or alarmism or what -- the point is that it's the truth; it's what's happening to us. And it's our responsibility to stop it.” W.L.P. "Thoughts on Accepting Responsibility" (February, 1999) (read) (listen to listen, right click "Save target/link as" )
(read/listen to more WLP)
And for myself and certainly most all of my colleagues in the Nationalist Coalition, I feel we must accept the burden of this responsibility again. We have failed to prevent the next wave of “new media” from falling into the exact same hands of control that the old, traditional mass-media was under. The exact same poison will continue to flow into the minds of our people. We must once again accept responsibility.
Let me be clear on this point. I am not opposed to the presence and usage of non-traditional means of communication such as online forums and networks. On the contrary, I have always felt like the internet, the World Wide Web, would give our people a somewhat audible voice again. While the mainstream media have effectively been out of our control and power for many decades now, the advent of the internet offered a new alternative. I remember when Dr. Pierce was able to go from just a shortwave radio broadcast onto the internet. His voice and message, his ability to promote our cause and educate and inform our people, multiplied exponentially. It was truly an encouraging and major transformation in our ability to communicate readily with our people.
Now, almost as quickly as we learned to use the internet in a semi-effective way to communicate with our people on a larger scale than ever before, the Jews at Google, Wikipedia, MySpace, Facebook, and Twitter have a way to silence our communication even better than before. The exact same minority of people, the exact same race of people, the exact same Tribe, has maintained a stranglehold control over the flow of information.
Right now the internet is being attributed with a democratizing of media, a sort of community-based source for news and information. In the digital-world, this is thought of as sort of an “open source” form of journalism. But if you look closely enough, and most people simply will not, this community-based, open-source, democratization of news and information is nothing more but an illusion. The exact same way the traditional, controlled mass media dictates who gets elected within a democracy, this new-media or social networking will dictate exactly what news and information will be allowed and shared within our democracy. We will be lead to believe that this user-generated news and information is just as righteous, just as commendable, and just as legitimate as anything produced by the will of the people. But we will have no more influence on this news and information than we do on who gets elected to political office within our democracy. And it will all be as equally lethal to our long-term survival.
phenomenon has really exploded and within a very short period of time; we are talking far less than a ten year time span. If some of us within Western civilization have learned anything over the past fifty years or so, it is that anytime you have any form of mass communication, any form of mass media, you can rest assured The Tribe is already dominating or figuring out how to quickly gain dominance. And Western civilization has failed miserably in any effort to control how these forms of mass media are owned and used within our society.
Essentially, at least ostensibly, these are online communities comprised of people who have some common interests that they want to share with others. And if everyone is not interested in actually sharing with their online community, they are at least interested in exploring what others share. Sure, it sounds innocent enough and taken out of context, at a theoretical level, it sounds like simply a societal evolutionary shift within the boundaries of modern technology.
at about 308 million people. Nielson and other research companies estimate that roughly 74% of the U.S. population is online or considered internet users. So of that percentage of the U.S. population, the estimate is that roughly 153 million make up the “social networking” population in the United States (includes both social networks and blogs). I have seen estimates from the U.S. Census bureau that put the number of households with a television set at only roughly 110 million. But our online population is closer to 153 million! Now extrapolate that estimate of over two-thirds to the global population. This is completely unprecedented in the history of the world and the concept of mass communication.
around a little with MySpace, nobody disputes that Facebook is king. It is really the undisputed largest social networking site in the world, including members from every continent on the globe. The only reliable source for data suggests that there are 150 million members across the world using Facebook. New reports out just recently claim the current global member list is now closer to 350 million. And of these, it is said that half of those users are logged-in and using Facebook every day.
As the worlds second largest social networking site with roughly 125 million users, MySpace is squarely in the number two rank for total members. But MySpace is king when it comes to revenue from advertisers. In 2008 it was estimated that MySpace generated $1 billion in revenue, yes that is billion with a B. Facebook had estimated revenue from advertisers of only $300 million. Additionally, though smaller geographically than Facebook, MySpace tends to focus more on targeting teenagers and young adults by offering more entertainment and customization options to its users. So if you think about estimated ad revenue of $1 billion, a targeted demographic of teenagers and young adults, you can imagine how close The Tribe is to MySpace.
or “new media”, that they are calling “micro-blogging.” It is still a form of social networking but is used more for real-time communication or sending what they call tweets via the Twitter website, text messaging via mobile phones/PDAs (including a mobile site at m.twitter.com), or a variety of other applications. Twitter is much more conversational in format and already very well integrated in the blogosphere. But more importantly, it is changing the news industry and how people receive information about what is going on in the world.
Usually ownership of Twitter is attributed to just a few individuals; Jack Dorsey, current Chairman, Evan Williams, current CEO, and Biz Stone, current Creative Director. Prior to the formation of Twitter, Evan Williams and Biz Stone were with a company called Obvious Corp. which was a company formed when they bought Odeo, Inc. which had a side project called Twitter. Odeo was yet another privately held company cofounded by Evan Williams, current CEO, and Noah Glass. It is not uncommon to see Noah Glass listed as a one of the original co-founders of Twitter but given his more obvious Jewish background he usually falls off most of the official lists.
Jack Dorsey is probably just a nerd-tech-geek from the Midwest, one getting the label "best and brightest" in technology by Business Week. On the other hand, Evan Williams and Biz Stone (pictured left with Williams) are probably both Jews and I base that assertion more on behavior than anything else. Biz Stone was born Christopher Isaac Stone and that certainly indicates a possible Jewish extraction. Evan Williams doesn’t carry a Tribal surname at all but his Sephardic looks alone could land him in the same extraction as his partner Isaac. Again, it is behavior that is most revealing with these two and as we will see, they have been very successful at attracting support and funding from The Tribe. So even without any obvious ancestral indication, Stone and Williams are an important part of the controlled “new media.”
“Godfather of Twitter” and the label is certainly well suited. If you follow the career of Evan Williams back far enough, you will note he is the one usually attributed with coining the term “blogger” and was one of the original co-founders of Pyra Labs in 1999. Pyra Labs was the small company which originally created the “Blogger” software which is now a Google-owned entity. Other developers attributed to writing much of the “Blogger” code but it is Williams that usually gets the credit. It is really the advent of “Blogger” that has had one of the largest impacts on the growth of this “new media.” The growth of blogs and the blogosphere is one area that has had the most profound influence on how people get news and information today and it is what drives the notion of the democratization of news media.
in 2001, Williams was supposedly the only employee left at Pyra and as his desperation grew so did his reliance on outside investors. That is where the Tribal influence becomes much more pronounced and clear with the Twitter crew.
considered the first spreadsheet. These two have been called “the most influential players in the PC revolution” and well suited as investors for Williams. An investment from the Jewish owned and operated Trellix allowed Pyra Labs to not only rebound and expand; the surviving Pyra Labs would eventually rewrite the “Blogger” software, gaining notoriety and respect throughout the cyber world.
technology IPO in history” would make a lot of people very wealthy and really quickly. It was at Google that Evan met his future Twitter partner and co-founder, Biz Stone. This Google connection, not to mention the Jewish connections, is a common thread throughout the Twitter story.
Publications which also controls Conde Nast Publications, a worldwide magazine publishing company. His son, Samuel Newhouse Jr. (pictured right) now controls it all and is on the Forbes list of world billionaires. Advance Publications is the largest privately owned media empire in the country, spanning newspapers, magazines (like Vogue, Vanity Fair, GQ), cable television, and the internet. Advance Publications is currently listed in the top fifty of the Forbes list of “America's Largest Private Companies”. It is estimated at having roughly $7.6 billion in annual revenue; yes that is billion with a B. Advance Publications, under the ownership and control of the Newhouse family, is a privately held company and can avoid publicly reporting much of anything. And that works out well for “new media” start-ups like Twitter.
O'Reilly & Associates, which is also known as O'Reilly Media, is thought to be one of the largest investors in Pyra Labs and Evan Williams. It is another privately held company engaged in publishing books, magazines, and other online services. At one time Evan Williams was employed at O'Reilly Media as a Marketing Coordinator. While the owner of that company, Tim O'Reilly, sports an undisputedly Irish name, I would not call him Irish. He has this Spielberg Sephardic look going and is married to Christina Feldmann. But looks are only skin deep and we can learn more about Tim O'Reilly (pictured left) by his behavior.
“The Twitter Book” with his co-author, Sarah Milstein. I assume Sarah Milstein has as much Irish in her as Tim and his sweetie Feldmann. But that assumption could be seen as racist on the surface. We really should look beyond things like that to better understand Tim O'Reilly, O'Reilly Media, and that relationship with the Twitter boys.
actually the main reason we researched the explosion of “new media” and how it was being controlled.
founded by venture capitalists, Robin and Saul Klein (a father and son team). These two Jews are well known in the business, investment, and digital-technology world but are also well-known within the Tribe. For example, Robin Klein is the current Chairman of The Jewish Chronicle. For those of you not savvy on your Jewish periodicals, the Jewish Chronicle is a UK-based newspaper and reportedly one of the “oldest continuously published Jewish newspaper in the world”. As you can imagine, being the Chairman of such a paper is a pretty big deal. Saul Klein, or junior to Jewish Chronicle Chairman, Robin Klein was once 
a Vice President at Skype, a Senior Vice President at Firefly Network, a co-founder and CEO at Video Island (now Lovefilm, a European competitor of NetFlix and Blockbuster), and much more. Robin and Saul Klein are what I would call Jew’s Jews and have a lot of influence.
It is not just the controlled mass media and corrupt politicians jumping on the Twitter Kosher-wagon. Earlier this year Israel's New York Consulate held a “live citizen press conference” on Twitter. There is already a special Jewish Twitter group called Twoozer based out of Jerusalem. A report last year from the Israel News Agency reported that Israel, and the report was specifically calling out the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Israel Prime Minister's Office, and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), were aggressively employing social media including Twitter to offset international reaction to the UN sanctioned Goldstone Report, a report accusing Israel of war crimes during the Caste Lead offensive into Gaza.
and social and political policy and I discovered that most of them were Jews, I figured I had the key to what was happening to America, and I tried to tell people about that. I'd say, "Listen, did you know that every major studio in Hollywood is run by Jews? Did you know that all three television networks are run by Jews?" In those days there were just three television networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC. And I'd start naming the Jews who were running the big film companies in Hollywood, the Jews who ran the networks, the Jews who owned the New York Times and the Washington Post and the three weekly news magazines. I'd say, "Hey, listen, the Jews make up less than three per cent of the population in the United States, and yet they control nearly every medium of mass communication. That's no coincidence." And people would tell me, "Well, so what? They're just good businessmen, that's all. They're clever at that sort of thing. That's how they got control. Don't worry about it."
