Back in Black

by Ed Cleveland

You know I really do not know who will be the next President of the United States of America and I stopped trying to make predictions about that type of electoral process shell game in a D-MOCK-RA-CE. When I was a younger White nationalist, I used to theorize and debate with friends about my predictions for who would get elected and put into the White House. I have always been pretty cynical about democracy and the election process in this country but I have found it interesting and often amusing to think about. I just try not to make too many predictions anymore.

I remember back in the 2000 Presidential election, what a spectacle that was. It was the closest Presidential election in the history of this country. I know your remember that one. The whole country remembers that one. In fact, the majority of the civilized world remembers that one. And boy oh boy what a display and shameful extravaganza that was. This was the US democratic, electoral process in action and display for the world and it was certainly a splendid example of how a modern day Democracy works.

This was the presidential contest between Al Gore, who was at the time then Vice President in the Clinton administration, and George W. Bush, who was at the time the governor of Texas not to mention the son of former president George H. W. Bush. We remember who one that election and surely we all remember how it all went. I won’t bore you with too many of the details but I just wanted to remind you how that all played out.

George W. Bush barely won the 2000 Presidential election with roughly 50% of the coveted Electoral College votes; he received 271 of those votes. His competitor, Albert Gore got roughly 49% of the Electoral College votes, he had 266. One of the delegates opted out of the circus so only 537 of the total 538 electoral votes were counted in that election and it takes 270 electoral votes to win under the Electoral College system. So it was a very close election to say the least.

What complicated these results even more than the closeness of the electoral vote tally was that the eventual looser, Mr. Gore, received over 500,000 more of the popular votes. And by popular votes I am talking about the number of actual voters; that is to say the individual featherless bipeds that have reached the voting age and are otherwise eligible to participate in our pathetic democratic process. In the 2000 Presidential election, roughly 60% of the electorate, the voting eligible featherless bipeds, came out to vote. This was one of the highest voter turn outs in US history. Typically less than 50% of the voting-age population turns out to vote in a Presidential election. So a lot of voters were pretty disappointed in the final results that our democracy produced. Around 51 million American citizens voted for Gore.

But Albert Gore's majority popular votes were out weighed by the votes of the delegates and super delegates from the pathetic Electoral College. And by delegates I am talking about the corrupt, career politicians spread out across the country that are chosen by the corrupt political parties that they represent and ultimately decide who becomes the president. So in the 2000 election, Boy George Bush became the President of the United States despite not having received a majority, or a plurality, of the popular vote. That is only the fourth time in the history of this country where that has happened. So there were a lot of disappointed voters as a result.

If that were not entertaining enough for cynical critics of democracy like me, there was much more. This played out over the course of several months and ultimately involved a decision by the US Supreme Court. There were vote recounts and debates over how ballets would be counted and which ballets could not be counted at all. The whole world learned about “hanging chads” and the "butterfly ballot". Ultimately the corrupt judicial system intervened and decided how the corrupt political system would have to be run. The whole thing was an embarrassment for the country and a testament to the democratic process.

Embarrassing as it was, I think it was an educational process for a lot of intelligent White people. This whole process, which attracted the attention of the entire world, did a great deal of good towards disenchanting some White people about the concept of Democracy. It challenged preconceived notions about the superiority of a democratic system. It challenged the sacred status of the whole concept of a democracy. The 2000 Presidential election caused some, not most but certainly some, intelligent White people to lose faith in the democratic process. And I can guarantee you that even more intelligent White people will loose faith in this process after the current Presidential election is over.

And another thing worth noting about the 2000 election was that it demonstrated a more obvious shift of the so called conservative political party; the Republican party. After eight years of the Democratic party controlling the White House with Bill Clinton sitting in the Oval Office, the Republican party reacted. Instead of maintaining a more conservative appeal, the Republican party shifted more towards the left with a more liberal appeal.

Think about it for a minute. I do not have to remind you that America is a changing country and it has been for a long time. America is changing into a more diverse, a more multicultural and most importantly a more non-White country. Naturally we should expect the nature of a democracy and the political parties that control it to change as the racial makeup of the country changes.

In the early part of the 20th century, just under 90 years ago the voters in this country were mostly White men. By the middle of the 20th century, just under 60 years ago, the electorate in this country was still mostly White. The population of this country was still almost 90% White in 1970. It dropped from approximately 90% in 1950 to roughly 88.6% in 1970 but the country was clearly still mostly White. But everything has changed. By the time Albert Gore lost his bid for the White house based on one Electoral College vote, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the White population had dropped to only 75.1%. That is a huge demographic shift and it is what I mean when I say America is a changing country. So what does this huge demographic shift in the racial composition mean in a Democracy?

What this means is that the politicians that try to get votes in this country must shift their message to appeal to a different audience. After all, American politicians are not interested in formulating public policies and laws that are in the best interest of the country. In fact, I would even argue that American politicians do not really even have ideologies that would help them formulate such policies. What they do have is a desire to get elected and eventually reelected. So that makes them more showmen than statesmen. They are simply political prostitutes that turn tricks for votes. The more votes they get the more successful they are as politicians. A wise man once said that if you want to make an impression on a politician you just need to convince him that you are willing and able to either hurt him or to help him. In a democracy, a politician is helped or hurt based on the number of votes they get in an election. As America continues to become more and more non-White, the politicians have to convince an increasingly more non-White voting population to vote for them. This causes the message they preach to shift to that of an increasingly more non-White appeal. And of course this is just fine with the Jews.

So in the 2000 presidential election, even with this population shift and a shift in the message of the politicians to appeal to it, the Republican Party could only garner roughly 50% of the vote. This indicates not only that the country was moving more towards the left within this multicultural, egalitarian, kinder and gentler, disaster we live in, but the political prostitutes that try to attract votes were shifting too. The distinction between the two parties is not quite as clear as it used to be and that trend continues today and we see a situation where a Black man can effectively run for President.

But the real reason I reminisced about the 2000 election was because that Presidential election featured what was a historical moment; a First. And the media gets pretty excited about these types of historical moments because it gives it an opportunity to trumpet about how diverse this country has become and how the White man is no longer the King of the Hill. The Jewish controlled media definitely likes to boast about these historical moments in diversity.

Right now the controlled media is giddy with excitement about having the First Black man, a mulatto actually, as the Democratic Party candidate for the highest office in this country, arguably the world, the Presidency of the United States. But back in the 2000 presidential election there was another First. Senator Joseph Lieberman was the Vice Presidential candidate on the Gore ticket. At the point, Lieberman became the first Jewish candidate to be included on a major American political party presidential ticket. Little Joe reminds me of the Droopy dog cartoon character originally created by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, or MGM. But the significance here is not his resemblance to Droopy dog but the fact that he was the FIRST Jewish candidate on a Presidential ballot, though he was on that ballot as the Vice President.

We have another First in this year’s Presidential election process. Barack Obama will be the first Black candidate to be on a major American political party Presidential ticket, and this time as the Presidential candidate, not as a Vice President as was the case with Droopy Joe. We talked earlier about the fact that America is a changing country. And Obama even uses the campaign slogan of “Change We Can Believe In”.

Well Barack and I have different opinions about change. But as far as his becoming the first legitimate Black Presidential candidate, was he really a first? Only in the real world, but not in the imaginary world created in Hollywood. The Jews have been posturing voters in this country for a Black President for decades.

The most recent example of what I am talking about is a very popular television show called “24” that stars Kiefer Sutherland as the hero Federal agent of a Counter Terrorist Unit. This television show featured a fictional David Palmer as the first black President of the United States. This virtual world First Black President outdated Obama’s real world First Black Presidential candidacy by over a decade. And believe me, this was no coincidence. “24” is an extremely popular award winning television show and it is produced by the FOX Broadcasting Company which is a subsidiary of the News Corporation which is run by the Jewish Media Mogul Rupert Murdoch. Fortune Magazine has Rupert Murdoch listed as the Number 2 on its “25 Most powerful people in business” behind only Steve Jobs and ahead of people like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. All of them are worth Billions of dollars - that is billions with a B. Rupert Murdoch is one powerful Jew and it is no accident what kind of virtual reality his media empire portrays for the minds of Americans. But this manifestation of the First Black President is not the first for Hollywood and not by a long shot.

You can go as far back as the early 1930s to see how the motion picture industry has toyed with the concept of a Black President of the United States. But back then it was more for humor. Now when Hollywood portrays a Black president it is much more deliberate and much more strategically fiendish.

In a short film called “Rufus Jones for President”, a 9 year-old pickaninny by the name of Sammy Davis Junior is featured. One day the young Rufus falls asleep on his mother’s lap and dreams he is the President of the United States. If you want to see how far the motion picture industry has changed, try to get a copy of this short film. What was an entertaining, satirical comedy back in 1933 is now considered a very politically incorrect, “derogatory and offensive” film so you might have a hard time finding it. The film had images of chickens, watermelons, and dice games. Rufus campaign slogan was “Two Pork Chops Every Time You Vote”. It is pretty amusing but this of course was long before the Jews latched their fangs into Hollywood and started pumping the poison.

Hollywood would offer many other comedic presentations over the years of the First Black President before Rupert Murdoch put the television show “24” in front of Boobus Americanus. The difference now is that the prospect of a Black President is no longer presented as outlandish or satirical. It is portrayed as realistic. What could only be laughed about in the past, what was only a comedic portrayal of a fictitious reality, is now presented as the real world by Hollywood. It has become a reality and something to just be accepted. By the time the show “24” became so popular, a David Palmer as the first black President of the United States was just the way it was and his race was barely ever even mentioned.

My point here is very simple but profound and something that some of us may have started to just take for granted. Most White Nationalists today understand how dangerous that the Jewish control of our Mass Media of news and entertainment has become. But realizing there is a danger is not as important as understanding how that danger grows and changes from a danger to a terminal condition.

Jewish control of the Mass Media has metastasized into a lethal and terminal condition in our civilization. From making us laugh with a tap dancing pickaninny named Rufus to manipulating our perceptions and attitudes about what is and what is not socially acceptable. Through the control of the Mass Media they can define what is and what is not politically correct. They can determine what we can and what we should not laugh about at all. And this power, this invisible hand of influence, extends into the way we vote for the President of the United States.

By portraying images through the television and movie screens, they can effectively dictate whatever reality they want by simulating that reality in the virtual reality they produce. When Hollywood stops portraying Black Presidents as simply something to laugh about to more of something we should just accept, then our reality begins to reflect the pseudo reality that Hollywood portrays to us. The Jewish controlled Mass Media has done this for decades now. Whether it is the manipulation and preparation of the American public for the reality of a Black President of the United States or the acceptance of every other destructive policy they are trying to push onto our people from homosexuality to race mixing and everything in-between. We can see the way to the White House clearly paved for Barack Obama. And the Jewish controlled mass media of news and entertainment have carefully lain the bricks for this roadway of change in America.

So indeed when Barack Obama promises “Change We Can Believe In”, trust me when I say you can believe there will be plenty of change if he gets elected. The New York Post has said that Obama has one of the “most liberal voting records in the Senate” . Coming from the New York Post, that is a pretty intense statement. But as I said earlier the boundaries between liberal and conservative politicians is pretty gray these days and Obama will endorse the same destructive and suicidal policies that . For me it does not matter which of them gets elected. Whether it be Twiddle Dee or Twiddle Dum, the results will be the same.

But the real change with an Obama presidency is it will mark a pinnacle achievement for the egalitarian propaganda and conditioning that the Jews, through their control of the mass media of news and entertainment, have been pumping into this country for the last forty years. Just think about it for a minute. Sure, Obama is not really the Ace of Spades in the so called “African American” population. He is a mulatto with a White mom and Black dad but he considers himself Black and that is all that matters. He is Black enough as far as the Jews are concerned and he is certainly Black in my book too.

Let’s think about what this means for a moment. A quick history lesson about Blacks in America will help us put all of this into perspective. For the most part, we can trace the origins of the Black race in this country back to the slave trade which started to some degree soon after the English started to colonize the New World. It lasted until the Thirteenth Amendment which Abraham Lincoln endorsed with his Emancipation Proclamation of 1863.

So we ended slavery and that was a smart thing to do. We should not be dependent on any other race for anything. But then we followed that with the utmost stupidity by just turning those millions of former slaves loose in our society. We should have immediately shipped them all back to Africa when there was only three or four million of them. Sure, it would have been expensive and it would have taken several years. But it would have been taken care of. We should have at least had them all sterilized or otherwise completely discouraged any type of reproduction. Now we have over 37 million of them in this country and one of them has a good shot at becoming the next President of the United States!

Back to our history lesson; After the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 at least we did not let our former slaves vote and there were strict laws on the books that prevented much interaction between Blacks and Whites. But back then, back before television, back before the Jews could effectively pump their egalitarian propaganda and poison into our people, our racial instincts were already doing what the laws were designed to enforce. The Laws of Nature were firmly in place and the state and federal laws just reinforced them.

But forty years later, in 1870 the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified and it granted the right for our former slaves to vote. Then the Civil Rights era hit full swing in the 1960s and colorful figures like Martin Luther King and Malcolm X became the figure heads and spokesman for the Black call for more equality and civil rights. The National Voting Rights Act of 1965 would be signed into law further extending the rights officially created under the Fifteenth Amendment and further secured the rights of our former slaves from Africa to vote. So now we have the splendid situation where not only do the former slaves that we failed to deport have the ability to vote in the Presidential elections, now they have a member of their own race competing in a Presidential election. Not only is Barack Obama competing in the 2008 Presidential election, according to CNN, Newsweek, Gallup, and Fox News, he is leading the competition in the so called “National polls”.

So think about that a minute. Not only is a Black man, a mulatto, in the race, he could win and be the first Black President of the United States of America and Commander and Chief of our armed forces among other things. About one hundred and forty years after the Emancipation Proclamation which ended slavery, a negro, or African American if you prefer, who the Constitution of 1787 would have counted as only three-fifths of a person, less than a full human being, could become our next President.

Perhaps the Founding Fathers of this Country, and all of those that participated in the Constitutional Convention, were just racists when they allowed for slavery and considered Blacks to be only three-fifths of a person; Perhaps so. Or perhaps they were not indoctrinated in the laws of Political Correctness and egalitarianism mythology that supports it. Perhaps they saw things that we have been taught to ignore because those things would challenge the whole foundation of equality and all the nonsense they are teaching our children in public schools and every where else these days. Perhaps they observed the world and developed educated opinions based on those observations. Perhaps they looked at the facts.

For example, little pesky details like the fact that Blacks commit more crimes than Whites do. You do not have to trust me as the Federal government collects and publishes statistics on this on a regular basis. And the results are always the same. Blacks are arrested at dramatically higher rates than any other race. Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white rate. We could go into great detail and cite federal statistics about the disproportionate representation for Blacks committing all sorts of violent crime from murder and rape all the way to robbery and assault but I don’t think it is necessary.

Another little pesky fact is that Blacks are much more likely to be drug users than Whites are. Looking at drug-related emergency room admissions, Blacks are admitted at almost 7 times the rate of Whites for heroin and morphine related emergencies and over 10 times the rate of Whites for cocaine related emergencies. As a direct correlation to these inconvenient facts about drug use amongst Blacks, we can look at information from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and see that even though Blacks make up only about 13% of the total US population, they account for about 49% of all AIDS cases. Likewise, in addition to intravenous drug use statistics and the correlation that has on the HIV infection rates amongst Blacks, other behavioral traits common amongst our former slaves drive other statistics. For example, the rates for virtually every other sexually transmitted disease shows the exact same disproportionate trends.

So there you have it, we could see a Black man as our next President and you can see what his race has already contributed to society. Much, much more important than any of the Constitutional amendments or congressional Acts I mentioned earlier, is the emergence of Jewish ownership and control of our mass media to guarantee that a Black man can become the President.

Now that the real world we live in is catching up to the virtual world that Jews like Rupert Murdoch have created for us in the controlled media, we can see Blacks coming to positions of power more and more in this country. Not only has the electorate shifted in this country enough away from the nearly 90% White composition we had just thirty years ago, our people have been sufficiently preconditioned to accept the reality of a Black President by the Jewish controlled mass media. And the manifestation of that pathetic outcome has been the use of the democratic system within a media driven society.

If you want to see a current example of how Blacks implement a democracy on their own, without White people to get in the way, do a quick Google search on Robert Mugabe and the Zimbabwe 2008 election. Now that is D-MOCK-RA-CE in action. There we can see a true Ace of Spade Black, a real Sub-Saharan African, witchdoctor-for-life, modifying democracy to meet his needs. Aint it grand?

Barack Obama may not be a Sub-Saharan Mugabe Black, but he is a Black man and he is running for President of the United States. On his side, which is to say on the side of a multicultural, egalitarian, kinder and gentler, democratic system, he has the endorsement of the Jewish controlled mass media and the decades of preconditioning it has done on the electorate of this country. And that electorate is more non-White than it has ever been. Factor on top of that a debased, demoralized and racially disorganized White population suffering from deliberately induced White guilt, and you have the Presidential election of 2008. You think America is ready for a Black President? We shall soon see but the victory for egalitarianism and the Jews that promote it is already apparent.

Thanks for joining the Nationalist Coalition again today.