You know I really do not know who will be the next
President of the United States of America and I stopped
trying to make predictions about that type of electoral
process shell game in a D-MOCK-RA-CE. When I was a younger
White nationalist, I used to theorize and debate with
friends about my predictions for who would get elected
and put into the White House. I have always been pretty
cynical about democracy and the election process in
this country but I have found it interesting and often
amusing to think about. I just try not to make too many
I remember back in the 2000 Presidential election,
what a spectacle that was. It was the closest Presidential
election in the history of this country. I know your
remember that one. The whole country remembers that
one. In fact, the majority of the civilized world remembers
that one. And boy oh boy what a display and shameful
extravaganza that was. This was the US democratic, electoral
process in action and display for the world and it was
certainly a splendid example of how a modern day Democracy
This was the presidential contest between Al Gore,
who was at the time then Vice President in the Clinton
administration, and George W. Bush, who was at the time
the governor of Texas not to mention the son of former
president George H. W. Bush. We remember who one that
election and surely we all remember how it all went.
I won’t bore you with too many of the details
but I just wanted to remind you how that all played
George W. Bush barely won the 2000 Presidential election
with roughly 50% of the coveted Electoral College votes;
he received 271 of those votes. His competitor, Albert
Gore got roughly 49% of the Electoral College votes,
he had 266. One of the delegates opted out of the circus
so only 537 of the total 538 electoral votes were counted
in that election and it takes 270 electoral votes to
win under the Electoral College system. So it was a
very close election to say the least.
What complicated these results even more than the closeness
of the electoral vote tally was that the eventual looser,
Mr. Gore, received over 500,000 more of the popular
votes. And by popular votes I am talking about the number
of actual voters; that is to say the individual featherless
bipeds that have reached the voting age and are otherwise
eligible to participate in our pathetic democratic process.
In the 2000 Presidential election, roughly 60% of the
electorate, the voting eligible featherless bipeds,
came out to vote. This was one of the highest voter
turn outs in US history. Typically less than 50% of
the voting-age population turns out to vote in a Presidential
election. So a lot of voters were pretty disappointed
in the final results that our democracy produced. Around
51 million American citizens voted for Gore.
But Albert Gore's majority popular votes were out weighed
by the votes of the delegates and super delegates from
the pathetic Electoral College. And by delegates I am
talking about the corrupt, career politicians spread
out across the country that are chosen by the corrupt
political parties that they represent and ultimately
decide who becomes the president. So in the 2000 election,
Boy George Bush became the President of the United States
despite not having received a majority, or a plurality,
of the popular vote. That is only the fourth time in
the history of this country where that has happened.
So there were a lot of disappointed voters as a result.
If that were not entertaining enough for cynical critics
of democracy like me, there was much more. This played
out over the course of several months and ultimately
involved a decision by the US Supreme Court. There were
vote recounts and debates over how ballets would be
counted and which ballets could not be counted at all.
The whole world learned about “hanging chads”
and the "butterfly ballot". Ultimately the
corrupt judicial system intervened and decided how the
corrupt political system would have to be run. The whole
thing was an embarrassment for the country and a testament
to the democratic process.
Embarrassing as it was, I think it was an educational
process for a lot of intelligent White people. This
whole process, which attracted the attention of the
entire world, did a great deal of good towards disenchanting
some White people about the concept of Democracy. It
challenged preconceived notions about the superiority
of a democratic system. It challenged the sacred status
of the whole concept of a democracy. The 2000 Presidential
election caused some, not most but certainly some, intelligent
White people to lose faith in the democratic process.
And I can guarantee you that even more intelligent White
people will loose faith in this process after the current
Presidential election is over.
And another thing worth noting about the 2000 election
was that it demonstrated a more obvious shift of the
so called conservative political party; the Republican
party. After eight years of the Democratic party controlling
the White House with Bill Clinton sitting in the Oval
Office, the Republican party reacted. Instead of maintaining
a more conservative appeal, the Republican party shifted
more towards the left with a more liberal appeal.
Think about it for a minute. I do not have to remind
you that America is a changing country and it has been
for a long time. America is changing into a more diverse,
a more multicultural and most importantly a more non-White
country. Naturally we should expect the nature of a
democracy and the political parties that control it
to change as the racial makeup of the country changes.
In the early part of the 20th century, just under 90
years ago the voters in this country were mostly White
men. By the middle of the 20th century, just under 60
years ago, the electorate in this country was still
mostly White. The population of this country was still
almost 90% White in 1970. It dropped from approximately
90% in 1950 to roughly 88.6% in 1970 but the country
was clearly still mostly White. But everything has changed.
By the time Albert Gore lost his bid for the White house
based on one Electoral College vote, according to the
U.S. Census Bureau, the White population had dropped
to only 75.1%. That is a huge demographic shift and
it is what I mean when I say America is a changing country.
So what does this huge demographic shift in the racial
composition mean in a Democracy?
What this means is that the politicians that try to
get votes in this country must shift their message to
appeal to a different audience. After all, American
politicians are not interested in formulating public
policies and laws that are in the best interest of the
country. In fact, I would even argue that American politicians
do not really even have ideologies that would help them
formulate such policies. What they do have is a desire
to get elected and eventually reelected. So that makes
them more showmen than statesmen. They are simply political
prostitutes that turn tricks for votes. The more votes
they get the more successful they are as politicians.
A wise man once said that if you want to make an impression
on a politician you just need to convince him that you
are willing and able to either hurt him or to help him.
In a democracy, a politician is helped or hurt based
on the number of votes they get in an election. As America
continues to become more and more non-White, the politicians
have to convince an increasingly more non-White voting
population to vote for them. This causes the message
they preach to shift to that of an increasingly more
non-White appeal. And of course this is just fine with
So in the 2000 presidential election, even with this
population shift and a shift in the message of the politicians
to appeal to it, the Republican Party could only garner
roughly 50% of the vote. This indicates not only that
the country was moving more towards the left within
this multicultural, egalitarian, kinder and gentler,
disaster we live in, but the political prostitutes that
try to attract votes were shifting too. The distinction
between the two parties is not quite as clear as it
used to be and that trend continues today and we see
a situation where a Black man can effectively run for
But the real reason I reminisced about the 2000 election
was because that Presidential election featured what
was a historical moment; a First. And the media gets
pretty excited about these types of historical moments
because it gives it an opportunity to trumpet about
how diverse this country has become and how the White
man is no longer the King of the Hill. The Jewish controlled
media definitely likes to boast about these historical
moments in diversity.
Right now the controlled media is giddy with excitement
about having the First Black man, a mulatto actually,
as the Democratic Party candidate for the highest office
in this country, arguably the world, the Presidency
of the United States. But back in the 2000 presidential
election there was another First. Senator Joseph Lieberman
was the Vice Presidential candidate on the Gore ticket.
At the point, Lieberman became the first Jewish candidate
to be included on a major American political party presidential
ticket. Little Joe reminds me of the Droopy dog cartoon
character originally created by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer,
or MGM. But the significance here is not his resemblance
to Droopy dog but the fact that he was the FIRST Jewish
candidate on a Presidential ballot, though he was on
that ballot as the Vice President.
We have another First in this year’s Presidential
election process. Barack Obama will be the first Black
candidate to be on a major American political party
Presidential ticket, and this time as the Presidential
candidate, not as a Vice President as was the case with
Droopy Joe. We talked earlier about the fact that America
is a changing country. And Obama even uses the campaign
slogan of “Change We Can Believe In”.
Well Barack and I have different opinions about change.
But as far as his becoming the first legitimate Black
Presidential candidate, was he really a first? Only
in the real world, but not in the imaginary world created
in Hollywood. The Jews have been posturing voters in
this country for a Black President for decades.
The most recent example of what I am talking about
is a very popular television show called “24”
that stars Kiefer Sutherland as the hero Federal agent
of a Counter Terrorist Unit. This television show featured
a fictional David Palmer as the first black President
of the United States. This virtual world First Black
President outdated Obama’s real world First Black
Presidential candidacy by over a decade. And believe
me, this was no coincidence. “24” is an
extremely popular award winning television show and
it is produced by the FOX Broadcasting Company which
is a subsidiary of the News Corporation which is run
by the Jewish Media Mogul Rupert Murdoch. Fortune Magazine
has Rupert Murdoch listed as the Number 2 on its “25
Most powerful people in business” behind only
Steve Jobs and ahead of people like Warren Buffet and
Bill Gates. All of them are worth Billions of dollars
- that is billions with a B. Rupert Murdoch is one powerful
Jew and it is no accident what kind of virtual reality
his media empire portrays for the minds of Americans.
But this manifestation of the First Black President
is not the first for Hollywood and not by a long shot.
You can go as far back as the early 1930s to see how
the motion picture industry has toyed with the concept
of a Black President of the United States. But back
then it was more for humor. Now when Hollywood portrays
a Black president it is much more deliberate and much
more strategically fiendish.
In a short film called “Rufus Jones for President”,
a 9 year-old pickaninny by the name of Sammy Davis Junior
is featured. One day the young Rufus falls asleep on
his mother’s lap and dreams he is the President
of the United States. If you want to see how far the
motion picture industry has changed, try to get a copy
of this short film. What was an entertaining, satirical
comedy back in 1933 is now considered a very politically
incorrect, “derogatory and offensive” film
so you might have a hard time finding it. The film had
images of chickens, watermelons, and dice games. Rufus
campaign slogan was “Two Pork Chops Every Time
You Vote”. It is pretty amusing but this of course
was long before the Jews latched their fangs into Hollywood
and started pumping the poison.
Hollywood would offer many other comedic presentations
over the years of the First Black President before Rupert
Murdoch put the television show “24” in
front of Boobus Americanus. The difference now is that
the prospect of a Black President is no longer presented
as outlandish or satirical. It is portrayed as realistic.
What could only be laughed about in the past, what was
only a comedic portrayal of a fictitious reality, is
now presented as the real world by Hollywood. It has
become a reality and something to just be accepted.
By the time the show “24” became so popular,
a David Palmer as the first black President of the United
States was just the way it was and his race was barely
ever even mentioned.
My point here is very simple but profound and something
that some of us may have started to just take for granted.
Most White Nationalists today understand how dangerous
that the Jewish control of our Mass Media of news and
entertainment has become. But realizing there is a danger
is not as important as understanding how that danger
grows and changes from a danger to a terminal condition.
Jewish control of the Mass Media has metastasized into
a lethal and terminal condition in our civilization.
From making us laugh with a tap dancing pickaninny named
Rufus to manipulating our perceptions and attitudes
about what is and what is not socially acceptable. Through
the control of the Mass Media they can define what is
and what is not politically correct. They can determine
what we can and what we should not laugh about at all.
And this power, this invisible hand of influence, extends
into the way we vote for the President of the United
By portraying images through the television and movie
screens, they can effectively dictate whatever reality
they want by simulating that reality in the virtual
reality they produce. When Hollywood stops portraying
Black Presidents as simply something to laugh about
to more of something we should just accept, then our
reality begins to reflect the pseudo reality that Hollywood
portrays to us. The Jewish controlled Mass Media has
done this for decades now. Whether it is the manipulation
and preparation of the American public for the reality
of a Black President of the United States or the acceptance
of every other destructive policy they are trying to
push onto our people from homosexuality to race mixing
and everything in-between. We can see the way to the
White House clearly paved for Barack Obama. And the
Jewish controlled mass media of news and entertainment
have carefully lain the bricks for this roadway of change
So indeed when Barack Obama promises “Change
We Can Believe In”, trust me when I say you can
believe there will be plenty of change if he gets elected.
The New York Post has said that Obama has one of the
“most liberal voting records in the Senate”
. Coming from the New York Post, that is a pretty intense
statement. But as I said earlier the boundaries between
liberal and conservative politicians is pretty gray
these days and Obama will endorse the same destructive
and suicidal policies that . For me it does not matter
which of them gets elected. Whether it be Twiddle Dee
or Twiddle Dum, the results will be the same.
But the real change with an Obama presidency is it
will mark a pinnacle achievement for the egalitarian
propaganda and conditioning that the Jews, through their
control of the mass media of news and entertainment,
have been pumping into this country for the last forty
years. Just think about it for a minute. Sure, Obama
is not really the Ace of Spades in the so called “African
American” population. He is a mulatto with a White
mom and Black dad but he considers himself Black and
that is all that matters. He is Black enough as far
as the Jews are concerned and he is certainly Black
in my book too.
Let’s think about what this means for a moment.
A quick history lesson about Blacks in America will
help us put all of this into perspective. For the most
part, we can trace the origins of the Black race in
this country back to the slave trade which started to
some degree soon after the English started to colonize
the New World. It lasted until the Thirteenth Amendment
which Abraham Lincoln endorsed with his Emancipation
Proclamation of 1863.
So we ended slavery and that was a smart thing to do.
We should not be dependent on any other race for anything.
But then we followed that with the utmost stupidity
by just turning those millions of former slaves loose
in our society. We should have immediately shipped them
all back to Africa when there was only three or four
million of them. Sure, it would have been expensive
and it would have taken several years. But it would
have been taken care of. We should have at least had
them all sterilized or otherwise completely discouraged
any type of reproduction. Now we have over 37 million
of them in this country and one of them has a good shot
at becoming the next President of the United States!
Back to our history lesson; After the Emancipation
Proclamation of 1863 at least we did not let our former
slaves vote and there were strict laws on the books
that prevented much interaction between Blacks and Whites.
But back then, back before television, back before the
Jews could effectively pump their egalitarian propaganda
and poison into our people, our racial instincts were
already doing what the laws were designed to enforce.
The Laws of Nature were firmly in place and the state
and federal laws just reinforced them.
But forty years later, in 1870 the Fifteenth Amendment
was ratified and it granted the right for our former
slaves to vote. Then the Civil Rights era hit full swing
in the 1960s and colorful figures like Martin Luther
King and Malcolm X became the figure heads and spokesman
for the Black call for more equality and civil rights.
The National Voting Rights Act of 1965 would be signed
into law further extending the rights officially created
under the Fifteenth Amendment and further secured the
rights of our former slaves from Africa to vote. So
now we have the splendid situation where not only do
the former slaves that we failed to deport have the
ability to vote in the Presidential elections, now they
have a member of their own race competing in a Presidential
election. Not only is Barack Obama competing in the
2008 Presidential election, according to CNN, Newsweek,
Gallup, and Fox News, he is leading the competition
in the so called “National polls”.
So think about that a minute. Not only is a Black man,
a mulatto, in the race, he could win and be the first
Black President of the United States of America and
Commander and Chief of our armed forces among other
things. About one hundred and forty years after the
Emancipation Proclamation which ended slavery, a negro,
or African American if you prefer, who the Constitution
of 1787 would have counted as only three-fifths of a
person, less than a full human being, could become our
Perhaps the Founding Fathers of this Country, and all
of those that participated in the Constitutional Convention,
were just racists when they allowed for slavery and
considered Blacks to be only three-fifths of a person;
Perhaps so. Or perhaps they were not indoctrinated in
the laws of Political Correctness and egalitarianism
mythology that supports it. Perhaps they saw things
that we have been taught to ignore because those things
would challenge the whole foundation of equality and
all the nonsense they are teaching our children in public
schools and every where else these days. Perhaps they
observed the world and developed educated opinions based
on those observations. Perhaps they looked at the facts.
For example, little pesky details like the fact that
Blacks commit more crimes than Whites do. You do not
have to trust me as the Federal government collects
and publishes statistics on this on a regular basis.
And the results are always the same. Blacks are arrested
at dramatically higher rates than any other race. Blacks
commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white
rate. We could go into great detail and cite federal
statistics about the disproportionate representation
for Blacks committing all sorts of violent crime from
murder and rape all the way to robbery and assault but
I don’t think it is necessary.
Another little pesky fact is that Blacks are much more
likely to be drug users than Whites are. Looking at
drug-related emergency room admissions, Blacks are admitted
at almost 7 times the rate of Whites for heroin and
morphine related emergencies and over 10 times the rate
of Whites for cocaine related emergencies. As a direct
correlation to these inconvenient facts about drug use
amongst Blacks, we can look at information from the
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and see that even
though Blacks make up only about 13% of the total US
population, they account for about 49% of all AIDS cases.
Likewise, in addition to intravenous drug use statistics
and the correlation that has on the HIV infection rates
amongst Blacks, other behavioral traits common amongst
our former slaves drive other statistics. For example,
the rates for virtually every other sexually transmitted
disease shows the exact same disproportionate trends.
So there you have it, we could see a Black man as our
next President and you can see what his race has already
contributed to society. Much, much more important than
any of the Constitutional amendments or congressional
Acts I mentioned earlier, is the emergence of Jewish
ownership and control of our mass media to guarantee
that a Black man can become the President.
Now that the real world we live in is catching up to
the virtual world that Jews like Rupert Murdoch have
created for us in the controlled media, we can see Blacks
coming to positions of power more and more in this country.
Not only has the electorate shifted in this country
enough away from the nearly 90% White composition we
had just thirty years ago, our people have been sufficiently
preconditioned to accept the reality of a Black President
by the Jewish controlled mass media. And the manifestation
of that pathetic outcome has been the use of the democratic
system within a media driven society.
If you want to see a current example of how Blacks
implement a democracy on their own, without White people
to get in the way, do a quick Google search on Robert
Mugabe and the Zimbabwe 2008 election. Now that is D-MOCK-RA-CE
in action. There we can see a true Ace of Spade Black,
a real Sub-Saharan African, witchdoctor-for-life, modifying
democracy to meet his needs. Aint it grand?
Barack Obama may not be a Sub-Saharan Mugabe Black,
but he is a Black man and he is running for President
of the United States. On his side, which is to say on
the side of a multicultural, egalitarian, kinder and
gentler, democratic system, he has the endorsement of
the Jewish controlled mass media and the decades of
preconditioning it has done on the electorate of this
country. And that electorate is more non-White than
it has ever been. Factor on top of that a debased, demoralized
and racially disorganized White population suffering
from deliberately induced White guilt, and you have
the Presidential election of 2008. You think America
is ready for a Black President? We shall soon see but
the victory for egalitarianism and the Jews that promote
it is already apparent.
Thanks for joining the Nationalist Coalition again